🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often spent years generating local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.